|
Post by PapaEZRA on May 6, 2005 11:13:25 GMT -5
Describing abortion as a health issue or as a women's rights issue is a pro-choice stance. Describing abortion as a moral issue or as an issue of balancing the mother's rights with the fetus' rights, is a pro-life stance. Any reference to "the rights of the unborn" is a strong pro-life stance, as is defining life "from the moment of conception." Any reference to "the rights of the mother" is a strong pro-choice stance, as is defining a "right to privacy" (between a woman and her doctor). As mentioned above, the most obscure buzzword is that supporting ‘judicial activism’ implies a pro-choice stance, while supporting ‘strict constructionism’ implies a pro-life stance. In nominations for Supreme Court justices, asking this question is the archetypical ‘Litmus Test’ -- liberal Senators spent many hours questioning Clarence Thomas on whether he held a Strict Constructionist view of the Constitution (he did not admit so). For serious policy wonks, the most important abortion buzzword is ‘Stare Decisis’ -- that is the basis upon which Clarence Thomas declined to rule against Roe v. Wade. Thomas meant that although he would have ruled against Roe v. Wade in 1973, he would not do so now because the 1973 Supreme Court ruling had been in force for a quarter century and hence has precedential weight.
[glow=red,2,300]*Note*[/glow] The previous is a post to give you facts and/or opinions of other people. Please post your reply below to the subject matter or on the topic of abortion, pertaining to this topic. Thankyou BlackHAWK
|
|
|
Post by angela on Jun 5, 2006 17:55:54 GMT -5
Getting an abortion is killing one of God children
|
|
|
Post by PapaEZRA on Jun 19, 2006 21:05:29 GMT -5
ABORTION = EXACUTION BEFORE BIRTH
|
|